[AFS3-std] Re: rxgk: Version numbers in XDR structures

[Andrew Deason]

On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 12:17:52 +0000
Simon Wilkinson <simon@sxw.org.uk> wrote:

>   4/ Rewrite the challenge definition in terms of either the proposed
>   new afs-union structure (which seems to me to break abstraction
>   layers)

This is what I thought would be done in cases like this. What
abstraction is this breaking? The new type is at the XDR layer, like all
of the other XDR primitives.

-- 
Andrew Deason
adeason@sinenomine.net