On Wed, 13 Feb 2013, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > I'll think about it more; I could still be convinced that always using an > afs-bos (or afs3-bos? We should be consistent about whether we use a '3') > identity for bosserver tokens is the right thing to to. This does make 'bos -localauth' substantially less powerful. Arguably, that is a feature, but it is something to consider. -Ben