[AFS3-std] rxgk-afs: moving SetCallBackKey to a separate document?

[Benjamin Kaduk]

On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Jeffrey Altman wrote:

> Extended callbacks cannot be fully implemented until there are protected
> callback channels.  That does not mean there are not benefits to
> protecting the callback channels in a world without extended callbacks.

I believe the question at hand is whether those benefits are sufficient to 
delay standardizing rxgk.  Do you have an opinion on this question?

Thanks,

Ben